ANALYSIS OF ABDOMINAL DELIVERY ACCORDING TO THE MOTHER’S REASONS
https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2018-15-3-339-346
Abstract
The present work studied the changes in the frequency of caesarean sections and established the dynamics of frequency of planned and urgent caesarean sections, the structure of caesarean section in the mother’s interests, and also the level of caesarean section for the reason of insolvency of uterus cicatrix for the period of 2001–2011 at the Kiev Municipal Maternity Hospital no. 1.
The increase in the frequency of caesarean sections is marked. The positive dynamics of growth of planned operative interferences frequency attracts attention. For the studied period, the level of frequency of caesarean sections for the reason of uterus cicatrix insolvency increased 4.7 times.
About the Authors
N. P. Goncharuk
Kiev City Maternity Hospital no. 1
Ukraine
Ukraine
Natalya P. Goncharuk – Ph. D. (Med.), Chief doctor
5, Arsenalnaya Str., Kiev
O. Iu. Gurzhenko
P. L. Shupik National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education
Ukraine
Ukraine
Elena Yu. Gurzhenko – Ph. D. (Med.), Assistant
9, Dorogozhitskaya Str., Kiev
References
1. Savel’eva G. M., Shalina R. I., Sachinava L. G., Panina O. B., Kurtser M. A. Obstetrics. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2009. 651 p. (in Russian).
2. Kir R. M. The myth about the ideal frequency of cesarean section: a commentary and an historical perspective. Meditsinskie aspekty zdorov’ya zhenshchiny [Medical aspects of women’s health], 2006, no. 3 (3), pp. 70–74 (in Russian).
3. Zizza A., Tinelli A., Malvasi A., Barbone E., Stark M., De Donno A., Guido M. Caesarean section in the world: a new ecological approach. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2011, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 161–73. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421- 4248/jpmh2011.52.4.287
4. Kulakov V. I., Chernukha E. A., Komissarova L. M. Cesarean section. Moscow, Meditsina Publ., 1998. 192 p. (in Russian).
5. Lepikhov S. V. Cesarean delivery criteria: evidence and consequences. Aktual’nі problemi suchasnoї meditsini: vіsnik ukraїns’koї medichnoї stomatologіchnoї akademії [Actual problems of modern medicine: bulletin of the Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy], 2009, vol. 9, no. 4, pt. 2, pp. 52–55 (in Russian).
6. Pirogova V. I. Operational delivery. Zdorov’ya Ukraїni [Health of Ukraine], 2011, no. 1, pp. 18–20 (in Russian).
7. Steven W. Operational delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology: Diagnosis and Treatment. Vol. 1. Obstetrics. Moscow, 2008, pp. 658–672 (in Russian).
8. Mozgovaya E. V., Abramchenko V. V., Kuz’minykh T. U., Kramareva N. L. Algorithms and tactics of conducting pathological births. St. Petersburg, N-L Publ., 2010. 56 p. (in Russian).
9. Pavlova T. Yu., Argunov V. A., Filippova R. D. Clinico-morphological aspects of the scar on the uterus after cesarean section. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal [Siberian Medical Journal], 2007, no. S2, pp. 10–12 (in Russian).
10. Makarov O. V., Ozolinya L. A., Kerchelaeva S. B., Bakhareva I. V., Ivanova O. G., Kozlov P. V., Nikolaev N. N., Slasten O. P., Volkova E. V., Idrisova L. S. Obstetrics. Clinical lectures. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2007. 630 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Goncharuk N.P., Gurzhenko O.I. ANALYSIS OF ABDOMINAL DELIVERY ACCORDING TO THE MOTHER’S REASONS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2018;15(3):339-346. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2018-15-3-339-346
Views: 490
Email this article 