Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Results of laparoscopic extravesical antireflux operation in vesicoureteral reflux in children

https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-4-427-436

Abstract

The objective was to improve the results of surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children, using laparoscopic access. The prospective study was performed in 111 children (137 ureters) with the primary III–IV grade vesicoureteral reflux. The mean age was 34.7 months. The modified laparoscopic antireflux technique was performed on 73 children (91 ureters). We compared the perioperative complications and the medium-term outcome with a group of 38 children (46 ureters) who underwent classical laparoscopic extravesical reimplantation.3 In the modified group, the mean surgery time was 109.8 ± 31.5 minutes for unilateral cases and 176.5 ± 47.6 minutes for bilateral cases; in the classical group, it was 118.6 ± 34.3 and 209.5 ± 51.2 minutes respectively (p > 0.05). Postoperative vesicoureteral reflux had 2 (2.7 %) patients in the main group and 8 (21.1 %) children in the control group (p  =  0.002). There was no ureteral obstruction in the both groups. The success rate for ureters was 97.8 % with modified technique versus 82.6 % after classical laparoscopic reimplantation (p = 0.003). Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation is a safe and effective surgical procedure. The modified technique may improve the surgical treatment results.

About the Authors

V. I. Dubrov
2nd City Children Clinical Hospital
Belarus

Vitaly I. Dubrov – Ph. D. (Med.), Head of the Department

17, Narochanskaya Str., 220020, Minsk



A. V. Strotsky
Belarusian State Medical University
Belarus

Alexandr V. Strotsky – D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department

83, Dzerzhinski Ave., 220116, Minsk



References

1. Gregoir W. Congenital vesico-ureteral reflux. Acta Urologica Belgica, 1962, vol. 30, pp. 286–300.

2. Lich R., Howerton L. W., Davis L. A. Ureteral reflux, its significance and correction. Southern Medical Journal, 1962, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 633–635. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-196206000-00020

3. Hendren W. H. Reoperation for the failed ureteral reimplantation. Journal of Urology, 1974, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59976-0

4. Daines S. L., Hodgson N. B. Management of reflux in total duplication anomalies. Journal of Urology, 1971, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 720–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61616-1

5. Zaontz M. R., Maizels M., Sugar E. C., Firlit C. F. Detrusorrhaphy: extravesical ureteral advancement to correct vesicoureteral reflux in children. Journal of Urology, 1987, vol. 138, no. 4, pt. 2, pp. 947–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43466-5

6. Palmer J. S. Extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an outpatient procedure. Journal of Urology, 2008, vol. 180, no. 4S, pp. 1828–1831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.080

7. Ehrlich R. M., Gershman A., Fuchs G. Laparoscopic vesicoureteroplasty in children: initial case reports. Urology, 1994, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(94)90058-2

8. Dubrov V. I., Bondarenko S. G., Kagantsov I. M. Modified single-sided laparoscopic extravesical antireflux operation. Rossiiskii vestnik detskoi khirurgii, anesteziologii i reanimatologii [Russian herald of pediatric surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care], 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 26–34 (in Russian).

9. Esposito C., Masieri L., Steyaert H., Escolino M., Cerchione R., Manna A., Cini C., Lendvay T. S. Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation (revur) for unilateral vesico-ureteral reflux in children: results of a multicentric international survey. World Journal of Urology, 2018, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2155-9

10. Marchini G. S., Hong Y. K., Minnillo B. J., Diamond D. A., Houck C. S., Meier P. M., Passerotti C. C., Kaplan J. R., Retik A. B., Nguyen H. T. Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach. Journal of Urology, 2011, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 1870–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069

11. Kagantsov I. M., Sizonov V. V., Dubrov V. I., Bondarenko S. G., Shmyrov O. S., Akramov N. R., Pirogov A. V., Kulaev A. V., Svarich V. G. Laparoscopic resection of a bladder diverticulum in children. Rossiiskii vestnik detskoi khirurgii, anesteziologii i reanimatologii [Russian herald of pediatric surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care], 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 51–57 (in Russian).

12. Soulier V., Scalabre A. L, Lopez M., Li C.-Y., Thach S., Vermersch S., Varlet F. Laparoscopic vesico-ureteral reimplantation with Lich-Gregoir approach in children: medium term results of 159 renal units in 117 children. World Journal of Urology, 2017, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1791–1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2064-y

13. Herz D., Fuchs M., Todd A., McLeod D., Smith J. Robotassisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplant: a critical look at surgical outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2016, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 402.e1–402.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.042

14. Kojima Y., Mizuno K., Umemoto Y., Yasui T., Hayashi Y., Kohri K. Ureteral advancement in patients undergoing laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Journal of Urology, 2012, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.018

15. Lakshmanan Y., Fung L. C. Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances. Journal of Endourology, 2000, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1089/08927790050152203

16. Barrieras D., Lapointe S., Reddy P. P., Williot P., McLorie G. A., Bägli D., Khoury A. E., Merguerian P. A. Urinary retention after bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation: does dissection distal to the ureteral orifice have a role? Journal of Urology, 1999, vol. 162, no. 3, pt. 2, pp. 1197–2000.

17. Fung, L. C., McLorie, G. A., Jain, U., Khoury, A. E., Churchill, B. M. Voiding efficiency after ureteral reimplantation: a comparison of extravesical and intravesical techniques. Journal of Urology, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1972–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67381-6

18. Minevich E., Aronoff D., Wacksman J., Sheldon C. A. Voiding dysfunction after bilateral extravesical detrusorrhaphy. Journal of Urology, 1998, vol. 160, no. 3, pt. 2, pp. 1004–1006. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199809020-00010

19. Leissner J., Allhoff E. P., Wolff W., Feja C., Höckel M., Black P., Hohenfellner R. The pelvic plexus and antireflux surgery: topographical findings and clinical consequences. Journal of Urology, 2001, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 1652–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66384-7

20. Yucel S., Baskin L. S. Neuroanatomy of the ureterovesical junction: clinical implications. Journal of Urology, 2003, vol. 170, no. 3, pp. 945–948. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000082728.20298.ac

21. Tsai Y. C., Wu C. C., Yang S. S. Minilaparoscopic nerve-sparing extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: a preliminary report. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 2008, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 767–770. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2007.0241

22. Riquelme M., Aranda A., Rodriguez C. Laparoscopic extravesical transperitoneal approach for vesicoureteral reflux. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 2006, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.16.312

23. Peters C. A. Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urologic Clinics of North America, 2004, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.007

24. Schomburg J. L., Haberman K., Willihnganz-Lawson K. H., Shukla A. R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: a single surgeon comparison to open surgery. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2014, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 875–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.02.013

25. Arlen A. M., Broderick K. M., Travers C., Smith E. A., Elmore J. M., Kirsch A. J. Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2016, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 169.e1–169.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007

26. Smith R. P., Oliver J. L., Peters C. A. Pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: comparison with open surgery. Journal of Urology, 2011, vol. 185, no. 5, pp. 1876–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.072

27. Hayashi Y., Mizuno K., Kurokawa S., Nakane A., Kamisawa H., Nishio H., Moritoki Y., Tozawa K., Kohri K., Kojima Y. Extravesical robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial experience in Japan with the ureteral advancement technique. International Journal of Urology, 2014, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1016–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12483

28. Gundeti M. S., Boysen W. R., Shah A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: technique modifications contribute to optimized outcomes. European Urology, 2016, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 818–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.065


Review

For citations:


Dubrov V.I., Strotsky A.V. Results of laparoscopic extravesical antireflux operation in vesicoureteral reflux in children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2020;17(4):427-436. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-4-427-436

Views: 972


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)