Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Is it enucleation or organ-sparing techniques for choroid melanoma treatment?

https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-3-320-328

Abstract

Choroid melanoma belongs to malignant tumors. The choice of treatment modality depends on a tumor size and site, ocular tunics conditions, clinic logistics, and the patient’s will. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of patients with choroid melanoma. The data of the Belarusian Cancer Registry and the case histories of patients with choroid melanoma (C69.3, ICD-10) over the period of 1999–2018 were studied. The incidence rates were evaluated on the basis of the analysis of the absolute number of persons taken ill with the disease, crude intensive rates calculated per 1,000,000 of population. To calculate the survival, the disease-specific cumulative 5-year survival rate was used. Significance evaluation was made applying the chisquare test. The incidence rates varied over the 20-year period and were 0.9  ‰ on the average. Enucleation was performed in 724 patients, 13.9 % (101 patients) being registered with synchronous and metachronous cancer. Patients with a sole tumor of choroid melanoma were analyzed. The amount of enucleations performed decreased by a factor of 1.8. To evaluate the survival, the groups of patients with large tumors were formed after enucleation and combination treatment was carried out. Of 623 patients subjected to enucleation, disease progression was established in 159 (25.5 %). Of 159 patients, the onset of disease progression occurred in 25 (15.7 %) in the 1st year, in 50 (31.5 %) in the 2nd year, and in 84 (52.8 %) in the 4th year and later. In the combination treatment group, consisting of 58 patients, decease progression was ascertained in 10 (17.2 %): in the 1st year – in 1 (10.0 %), in the 2nd year – in 6 (60.0 %), and in the 4th and later – in 3 (30.0 %). The survival rate after the organ-sparing treatment is insignificantly higher and increases to the 5th year of the follow-up, although the data are statistically insignificant (p > 0.5). At present, enucleation does not play the leading role in the choice of treatment modality for patients with clinical diagnosis of choroid melanoma. The disease-specific cumulative 5-year survival rate in patients receiving organ-sparing treatment was 85.7 ± 5.1 %, and in those subjected to enucleation – 67.2 ± 2.2 %, the data being statistically insignificant (p  >  0.5). The promising trend in treating choroid melanoma patients is the development of organ-sparing treatment techniques.

About the Authors

L. V. Naumenko
N. N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Belarus

Larisa V. Naumenko ‒ Ph. D. (Med.), Leading Researcher

223040, Lesnoy, Minsk Region



S. A. Krasny
N. N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Belarus

Sergey A. Krasny ‒ Corresponding Member, D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director

223040, Lesnoy, Minsk Region



K. P. Zhyliaeva
N. N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Belarus

Katsiaryna P. Zhyliaeva ‒  Ophthalmologist

223040, Lesnoy, Minsk Region



A. A. Evmenenko
N. N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Belarus

Alesya A. Evmenenko ‒ Anticancer Control Specialist

223040, Lesnoy, Minsk Region



G. A. Suschenya
Minsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital
Belarus

Galina A. Suschenya ‒ Ophthalmologist

223040, Lesnoy, Minsk Region



References

1. Brovkina A. F. (ed.). Ophthalmic oncology. Moscow, Meditsina, 2002. 420 p. (in Russian).

2. Shields C. L., Furuta M., Thangappan A., Nagori S., Mashayekhi A., Lally D. R. [et al.]. Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033 consecutive eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 2009, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.208

3. Singh A. D., Turell M. E., Topham A. K. Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology, 2011, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 1881–1885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.040

4. Andreoli M. T., Mieler W. F., Leiderman Y. Epidemiological trends in uveal melanoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 1550–1553. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306810

5. Kivelä T. The epidemiological challenge of the most frequent eye cancer: retinoblastoma, an issue of birth and death. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1129–1131. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.150292

6. Park S. J., Oh C.-M., Kim B. W., Woo S. J., Cho H., Park K. H. Nationwide incidence of ocular melanoma in South Korea by using the National cancer registry database (1999–2011). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2015, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 4719–4724. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-16532

7. Biswas J., Kabra S., Krishnakumar S., Shanmugam M. P. Clinical and histopathological characteristics of uveal melanoma in Asian Indians. A study of 103 patients. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 41–44.

8. Cheng C.-Y., Hsu W.-M. Incidence of eye cancer in Taiwan: an 18-year review. Eye, 2004, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700619

9. Liu Y. M., Li Y., Wei W. B., Xu X., Jonas J. B. Clinical characteristics of 582 patients with uveal melanoma in China. PLoS ONE, 2015, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. e0144562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144562

10. Sakamoto T., Sakamoto M., Yoshikawa H., Hata Y., Ishibashi T., Ohnishi Y., Inomata H. Histologic findings and prognosis of uveal malignant melanoma in Japanese patients. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1996, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70275-2

11. Phillpotts B. A., Sanders R. J., Shields J. A., Griffiths J. D., Augsburger J. A., Shields C. L. Uveal melanomas in black patients: a case series and comparative review. Journal of the National Medical Association, 1995, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 709–714. PMCID: PMC2607893

12. Hudson H. L., Valluri S., Rao N. A. Choroidal melanomas in Hispanic patients. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1994, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72842-9

13. Naumenko L. V., Zhilyaeva E. P., Evmenenko A. A. Analysis of statistical indicators of the incidence of choroidal melanoma in the Republic of Belarus for the period 1997–2016]. Onkologicheskii zhurnal [Oncological journal], 2018, vol. 12, no. 3–4, pp. 21–28 (in Russian).

14. Damato B. Progress in the management of patients with uveal melanoma. The 2012 Ashton lecture. Eye, 2012, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.126

15. Ewens K. G., Kanetsky P. A., Richards-Yutz J., Purrazzella J., Shields C. L., Ganguly T, Ganguly A. Chromosome 3 status combined with BAP1 and EIF1AX mutation profiles are associated with metastasis in uveal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2014, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 5160–5167. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14550

16. Field M. G., Harbour J. W. Recent developments in prognostic and predictive testing in uveal melanoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2014, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000051

17. Onken M. D., Worley L. A., Char D. H., Augsburger J. J., Correa Z. M., Nudleman E. [et al.]. Collaborative ocular oncology group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology, 2012, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.017

18. Kaliki S., Shields C. L. Uveal melanoma: relatively rare but deadly cancer. Eye, 2017, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.275

19. Ewens K. G., Kanetsky P. A., Richards-Yutz J., Al-Dahmash S., De Luca M. C., Bianciotto C. G., Shields C. L., Ganguly A. Genomic profile of 320 uveal melanoma cases: chromosome 8p-loss and metastatic outcome. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2013, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 5721–5729. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12195

20. Bechrakis N. E., Bornfeld N., Zöller I., Foerster M. H. Iodine 125 plaque brachytherapy versus transscleral tumor resection in the treatment of large uveal melanomas. Ophthalmology, 2002, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1855–1861. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01273-3

21. Shields J. A., Shields C. L. Intraocular tumors. An atlas and textbook. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, 2008, pp. 85–139.

22. Shields J. A., Shields C. L. Management of posterior uveal melanoma: past, present, and future: the 2014 Charles L. Schepens lecture. Ophthalmology, 2015, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.046

23. Singh A. D., Rennie I. G., Kivela T., Seregard S., Grossniklaus H. The Zimmerman–McLean–Foster hypothesis: 25 years later. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 962–967. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2003.029058

24. Damato B. The role of eyewall resection in uveal melanoma management. International Ophthalmology Clinics, 2006, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iio.0000195862.71558.c8

25. Hawkins B. S. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of pre-enucleation radiation of large choroidal melanoma: IV. Ten-year mortality findings and prognostic factors. COMS report number 24. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 936–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.006

26. Caminal J., Padrón-Pérez N., Arias L., Masuet-Aumatell C., Gutiérrez C., Piulats J. M., Pera J., Català J., Rubio M. J., Arruga J. Transscleral resection without hypotensive anaesthesia vs iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. Eye (Lond.)., 2016, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.49

27. Willerding G. D., Cordini D., Moser L., Krause L., Foerster M. H., Bechrakis N. E. Neoadjuvant proton beam irradiation followed by transscleral resection of uveal melanoma in 106 cases. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307095

28. Bechrakis N. E., Petousis V., Willerding G., Krause L., Wachtlin J., Stroux A., Foerster M. H. Ten-year results of transscleral resection of large uveal melanomas: local tumour control and metastatic rate. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.162487

29. Puusaari I., Damato B., Kivelä T. Transscleral local resection versus iodine brachytherapy for uveal melanomas that are large because of tumour height. Graefe’s Archive for Clinica and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2007, vol. 245, no. 4, pp. 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0461-9

30. Stoyukhina A. S., Chesalin I. P. Survival rates for large choroidal melanomas. Vestnik oftal’mologii [Bulletin of ophthalmology], 2014, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 39–44 (in Russian).

31. Dunavoelgyi R., Dieckmann K., Gleiss A., Sacu S., Kircher K., Georgopoulos M., Georg D., Zehetmayer M., Poetter R. Local tumor control, visual acuity, and survival after hypofractionated stereotactic photon radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma in 212 patients treated between 1997 and 2007. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2011, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.035

32. Weber B., Paton K., Ma R., Pickles T. Outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy for large non-peripapillary choroidal and ciliary body melanoma at TRIUMF and the BC cancer agency. Ocular Oncology and Pathology, 2015, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000433546

33. Okeanov A. E., Moiseev P. I., Levin L. F., Evmenenko A. A., Sukonko O. G. Statistics of oncological diseases in the Republic of Belarus 2008–2017: Belarusian Cancer Register. Minsk, Belarusian Republican Scientific and Practical Center of Oncology and Medical Radiology named after N. N. Alexandrov, 2018. 284 p. (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Naumenko L.V., Krasny S.A., Zhyliaeva K.P., Evmenenko A.A., Suschenya G.A. Is it enucleation or organ-sparing techniques for choroid melanoma treatment? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2020;17(3):320-328. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-3-320-328

Views: 1160


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)