A classification method for predicting suicide risk
https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-2-248-256
Abstract
A model has been developed to classify patients according to the degree of suicidal risk based on social, mental, psychological and biochemical data.
Based on the analysis of 15,996 cases of parasuicides and 2,355 cases of suicides, three patient groups were formed: persons who had suicidal attempt with high probability of death (mainly hanging), persons who had suicidal attempt in other ways, and persons who had diagnosed adjustment disorder and did not have suicidal attempts (comparison group). The groups consisted of 40, 80 and 40 people, respectively.
For all studied patients fixed socio-demographic data, diagnosis, determined individual and characterological features, measured lipid metabolism in peripheral blood. A total of 32 factors were investigated. A model has been developed to classify patients according to the degree of suicidal risk based on these data.
The most important factors for classifying patients by risk of suicide are pronounced motivation for suicide, the type of mental disorder and the type of temperament.
About the Authors
S. V. DavidouskiBelarus
Siarhey V. Davidouski – Ph. D. (Med.), Assistant Professor
J. A. Ibragimova
Belarus
Janna A. Ibragimova – Ph. D. (Biol.), Head of the Laboratory
A. V. Goncharik
Belarus
Аntonina V. Goncharik – Senior researcher
L. V. Kartun
Belarus
Ludmila V. Kartun – Senior researcher
N. N. Leonov
Belarus
Nikolay N. Leonov – Ph. D. (Phys. and Math.), Leading researcher
L. I. Danilova
Belarus
Larisa I. Danilova – D. Sc. (Med.), Professor
V. V. Kuzhal
Belarus
Vadzim V. Kuzhal – Psychiatrist-narcologist
I. S. Zalesskaya
Belarus
Irina S. Zalesskaya – Head of the Department
A. N. Tretyk
Belarus
Andrey N. Tretyk – Head of the Department
Yu. M. Mikitski
Belarus
Yuri M. Mikitski – Director
References
1. Yur’eva L. N. Clinical suicidology. Dnepropetrovsk, Porogi Publ., 2006. 472 р. (in Russian).
2. Davidovskii S. V. Features of suicidal behavior among residents of Minsk. Zdravookhranenie [Healthcare], 2016, no. 3, рр. 72–77 (in Russian).
3. Preventing suicide: a global imperative. Geneva, Word Health Organization, 2014. 92 p.
4. Guintivano J., Brown T., Newcomer A., Jones M., Cox O., Maher B. S. [et al.]. Identification and replication of a combined epigenetic and genetic biomarker predicting suicide and suicidal behaviors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2014, vol. 171, no. 12, pp. 1287–1296. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010008
5. Calati R., Nemeroff C. B., Lopez-Castroman J., Cohen L. J., Galynker I. Candidate biomarkers of suicide crisis syndrome: what to test next? A concept paper. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. [Online ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyz063
6. Insel T. R. Assessing the economic costs of serious mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2008, vol. 165, no. 6, рр. 663–665. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030366
7. McDaid D., Kennelly B. An economic perspective on suicide across the five continents. Oxford textbook of suicidology and suicide prevention. Oxford, 2009, рр. 360–368.
8. Dwivedi Y. The neurobiological basis of suicide. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2012. 482 p.
Review
For citations:
Davidouski S.V., Ibragimova J.A., Goncharik A.V., Kartun L.V., Leonov N.N., Danilova L.I., Kuzhal V.V., Zalesskaya I.S., Tretyk A.N., Mikitski Yu.M. A classification method for predicting suicide risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2020;17(2):248-256. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-2-248-256