Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Neurophysiological substantiation of the differentiated rehabilitation in patients with lumbar spine injury

https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2018-15-4-422-428

Abstract

Electrophysiological evaluation of the features of the functional state of the spinal cord in 26 patients with a fractured L1 vertebra before and after operation was made. The analysis data of the results on electromyography and transcranial magnetic stimulation allowed estimating the impairment degree of spinal cord functions and determining the volume and time of rehabilitation completion.

About the Authors

I. A. Ilyasevich
Republican Scientific-Practical Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Minsk
Belarus
D. Sc. (Biol.), Assistant Professor, Head of the Laboratory


E. V. Soshnikova
Republican Scientific-Practical Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Minsk
Belarus
D. Sc. (Biol.), Leading researcher


A. N. Mazurenko
Republican Scientific-Practical Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Minsk
Belarus
D. Sc. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Head of the Laboratory


K. A. Krivorot
Republican Scientific-Practical Centre of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Minsk
Belarus
Senior researcher


References

1. Kornilov N. V., Usikov V. D. Damage of the spine. Tactics of surgical treatment. St. Petersburg, MORSAR AV Publ., 2000. 231 p. (in Russian).

2. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine, 1983, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003

3. Polishchuk N. E., Korzh N. A., Fishchenko V. Ya. (ed.). Damage of the spine and spinal cord. Kiev, Kniga plyus Publ., 2001. 387 p. (in Russian).

4. Shan’ko Yu. G., Tanin A. L., Makarevich S. V., Mazurenko A. N. Practical guide to neurotraumatology. Minsk, Belprint Publ., 2010. 347 p. (in Russian).

5. Borshchenko I. A., Baskov A. V., Korshunov A. G., Satanova F. S. Some aspects of the pathophysiology of traumatic injury and spinal cord regeneration. Voprosy neurohirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko = Problems of neurosurgery named after N. N. Burdenko, 2000, no. 2, pp. 28–31 (in Russian).

6. Shevelev I. N., Yarikov D. E., Baskov A. V., Borshchenko I. A. The restoration of the function of the spinal cord: modern possibilities and prospects of research. Voprosy neurohirurgii im. N. N. Burdenko = Problems of neurosurgery named after N. N. Burdenko, 2000, no. 3, pp. 35–39 (in Russian).

7. Savic G., Frankel H. L. Prognosis and recovery in ischaemic and traumatic spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1999, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 564565. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.67.5.564

8. Xie J., Boakye M. Electrophysiological outcomes after spinal cord injury. Neurosurgical Focus, 2008, vol. 25, no. 5, p. E11. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2008.25.11.e11

9. Belyaev V. I. Trauma of the spinal cord (diagnosis, electrostimulation and restorative treatment). Moscow, Vladmo Publ., 2001. 238 p. (in Russian).

10. Lazzaro V. Di, Pilato F., Oliviero A., Saturno E., Dileone M., Tonali P. A. Role of motor evoked potentials in diagnosis of cauda equine and lumbosacral cord lesions. Neurology, 2004, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2266-2271. https://doi.org/10.1212/01. wnl.0000147296.97980.ca

11. Kachesov V. A. Fundamentals of intensive rehabilitation. Injury of the spine and spinal cord. Vol. 1. Moscow, s. n., 2002. 126 p. (in Russian).

12. Smychek V. B., Osipov Yu. V., Dulub O. I. Medical rehabilitation of victims with vertebral-spinal trauma at the stages of specialized medical care (medical and rehabilitation): instruction for use no. 216-1208. Minsk, 2008. 16 p. (in Russian).

13. Oganisyan A. A. Plastic changes in the central nervous system in spinal cord injury. Elektrofiziologicheskie issledovaniya kompensatsii funktsii pri povrezhdeniyakh tsentral’noi nervnoi sistemy: sbornik statei [Electrophysiological studies of the com pensation of functions in injuries of the central nervous system: a collection of articles]. Moscow, 1968, pp. 5–19 (in Russian).

14. Pinchuk D. Yu., Dudim M. G. Biological feedback by electromyogram in neurology and orthopedics. St. Petersburg, Chelovek Publ., 2002. 120 p. (in Russian).

15. Zefirov A. L., Kurtasanov L. S. Mechanisms of nerve ending’s functions restoration during skeletal muscles reinnervation. Fiziologichesky zhurnal im. I. M. Sechenova = Russian Journal of Physiology, 1995, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 106-113 (in Russian).

16. Ekusheva E. V., Voitenkov V. B., Scripchenko N. V. Neurophysiology in the assessment of the efficacy of the rehabilitation of sensomotor disturbances due to spinal cord lesions. Vestnik klinicheskoi neurophiziologii (spec. vypusk: Klinicheskaya neurophysiologiya i reabilitaciya: materialy 5-i nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Proceedings of Clinical Neurophysiology (special issue: Clinical neurophysiology and neurorehabilitation: materials of the 5th scientific and practical conference with international participation)]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2017, pp. 131–132.

17. Beletskii A. V., Makarevich S. V., Il’yashevich I. A., Mazurenko A. N., Bobrik P. A., Yurchenko S. M., Zalepugin S. D., Krivorot K. A. Method of clinico-functional evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of patients with bone-traumatic injuries of the spine : instruction for use no. 003-0217. Minsk, 2017. 10 p. (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Ilyasevich I.A., Soshnikova E.V., Mazurenko A.N., Krivorot K.A. Neurophysiological substantiation of the differentiated rehabilitation in patients with lumbar spine injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2018;15(4):422-428. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2018-15-4-422-428

Views: 381


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)