X-ray genetic phenotype of congenital disease development
https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2018-15-4-414-421
Abstract
The aim of the study is to describe the radiological phenotype of vertebral malformations in congenital scoliosis and to discuss the possible mechanisms of morphogenesis of some of these anomalies. The article describes 5 cases of complete or partial splitting in the sagittal plane of the body of one of the thoracic vertebrae (butterfly-shaped vertebra). The anterior vertebral cleft was combined with other congenital vertebral anomalies: block of vertebra, hemivertebrae, spina bifida posterior. All patients had scoliosis with right-sided or left-sided curves. In the human fetuses of the first trimester of gestation without visible malformations in the cartilaginous anlages of the thoracic vertebral bodies we revealed the presence of one o three centers of ossification, and in the fetus with exensephaly – the lack of the intervertebral disc anlage between the bodies C2-C3. According to the published data, the etiology of congenital vertebral anomalies is multifactorial. In the pathogenesis of this pathology, there is a violation of local blood flow due to the anomalous course of intersegmental arteries and as a consequence – a complete or partial separation of adjacent somites or associated mesenchyme. According to the published data, a possible cause of the anterior cleft may be untimely an involution of cartilage canals, the growth of which in the cartilaginous anlage of the vertebral body precedes the appearance of the ossification center. The absence of the intervertebral disk at a considerable length between the cartilaginous anlages of bodies 2 and 3 of the cervical vertebrae in the human fetus with exencephaly indicates a close relationship between the axial skeleton and the neural tube.
About the Authors
S. L. KabakBelarus
D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department
V. V. Zatochnaya
Belarus
Senior Lecturer
N. O. Zhizhko-Mikhasevich
Belarus
Radiologist
References
1. Ul’rikh E. V., Mushkin A. Yu., Gubin A. V. Congenital spine deformities in children: epidemiological prognosis and management. Khirurgiya pozvonochnika [Spine Surgery], 2009, no. 2, pp. 55–61 (in Russian).
2. Giampietro P. F., Raggio C. L., Blank R. D., McCarty C., Broeckel U., Pickart M. A. Clinical, genetic and environmental factors associated with congenital vertebral malformations. Molecular Syndromology, 2013, vol. 4, no. 1–2, pp. 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345329
3. Hesemann J., Lauer E., Ziska S., Noonan K., Nemeth B., Scott-Schwoerer J. et al. Analysis of Maternal Risk Factors Associated with Congenital Vertebral Malformations. Spine, 2013, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. E293–E298. https://doi.org/10.1097/ BRS.0b013e318283be6e
4. Erol B., Kusumi K., Lou J., Dormans J. P. Etiology of congenital scoliosis. University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal, 2002, vol. 15, pp. 37–42.
5. Khanna P. Essentials of genetics. New Delhi, I. K. International Publishing House Pvt. Ltd, 2010. 492 p.
6. Goto S., Uhthoff H. K. Notochord and spinal malformations. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1986, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 149–153. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678609000890
7. Fleming A., Kishida M. G., Kimmel C. B., Keynes R. J. Building the backbone: the development and evolution of vertebral patterning. Development, 2015, vol. 142, no. 10, pp. 1733–1744. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.118950
8. Christ B., Wilting J. From somites to vertebral column. Annals of Anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger, 1992, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0940-9602(11)80337-7
9. Kaplan K. M., Spivak J. M., Bendo J. A. Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine Journal, 2005, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.044
10. Skórzewska A., Grzymisławska M., Bruska M., Łupicka J., Woźniak W. Ossification of the vertebral column in human foetuses: histological and computed tomography studies. Folia Morphologica, 2013, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 230–238. https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.2013.0038
11. Szpinda M., Baumgart M., Szpinda A., Woźniak A., Małkowski B., Wiśniewski M., Mila-Kierzenkowska C., Króliczewski D. Cross-sectional study of the ossification center of the C1–S5 vertebral bodies. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2012, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-1045-5
12. Shands A. R., Eisberg H. B. The incidence of scoliosis in the state of Delaware: a study of 50,000 minifilms of the chest made during a survey for tuberculosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1955, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1243–1249. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195537060-00012
13. Doberentz E., Schumacher R., Gembruch U., Gasser J. A., Müller A. M. Coronal vertebral clefts: a radiological indicator for chromosomal aberrations. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 2013, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2350/12-04-1186-oa.1
14. Tanaka T., Uhthoff H. K. Coronal cleft of vertebrae, a variant of normal enchondral ossification. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1983, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 389–395. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678308996590
15. Tubbs R. S., Shoja M. M., Loukas M. (eds.). Bergman’s comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2016. 1432 p.
16. Hopkins R. M., Abbott J. H. Congenital “butterfly vertebra” associated with low back pain: a case report. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, 2013, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042618613y.0000000057
17. Keenan B. E., Izatt M. T., Askin G. N., Labrom R. D., Bennett D. D., Pearcy M. J., Adam C. J. Sequential magnetic resonance imaging reveals individual level deformities of vertebrae and discs in the growing scoliotic spine. Spine Deformity, 2017, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.10.002
18. Cho H.-L., Kim J.-S., Paeng S. S., Lee S.-H. Butterfly vertebra with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: case report. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2011, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 567–570. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.spine1178
19. Kapetanakis S., Giovannopoulou E., Nastoulis E., Demetriou T. Butterfly vertebra. A case report and a short review of the literature. Folia Morphologica, 2016, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 117–121. https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.a2015.0066
20. Debnath U. K., Goel V., Harshavardhana N., Webb J. K. Congenital scoliosis – Quo vadis? Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2010, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 137–147. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.61997
21. Feldman D. S., Schachter A. K., Alfonso D., Lonner B. S., Razi A. E. Congenital scoliosis. Surgical Management of Spinal Deformities. Philadelphia, 2008, pp. 129–141.
22. David K. M., Copp A. J., Stevens J. M., Hayward R. D., Crockard H. A. Split cervical spinal cord with Klippel–Feil syndrome: seven cases. Brain, 1996, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1859–1872. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.6.1859
23. Ming J. E., McDonalds-McGinn D. M., Megerian T. E., Driscoll D. A., Elias E. R., Russell B. M. et al. Skeletal anomalies and deformities in patients with deletions of 22q11. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19971017)72:23.0.co;2-q
24. Yadav Y., Goswami P., Bharihoke V. Cervical Vertebra Synostosis (C2-C3) – A Case Report. American Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2014, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 120–122.
25. Cave P. Butterfly vertebra. The British Journal of Radiology, 1958, vol. 31, no. 369, pp. 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-31-369-503
26. Goto S., Uhthoff H. K. Notochord and spinal malformations. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1986, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 149–153. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678609000890
27. Kabak S. L., Mel’nichenko Yu. M., Savrasova N. A., Zhuravleva N. V. Bifid mandibular canal. Stomatologiya [Stomatology], 2018, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 63–66. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201897163-66 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kabak S.L., Zatochnaya V.V., Zhizhko-Mikhasevich N.O. X-ray genetic phenotype of congenital disease development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2018;15(4):414-421. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2018-15-4-414-421