Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

EVALUATION OF THE DESCRIPTIVENESS OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPINAL CORD DISORDERS

Abstract

The electrophysiological evaluation of the features of the functional state of the spinal cord in 30 patients with fractured L1 vertebra before and after operation was performed. The analysis data of the results of total and stimulating electromyography, transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials allowed one to estimate the degree of the disorder of the spinal cord and its roots in lumbar spine damage.

About the Authors

I. A. ILYASEVICH
Republic Scientific and Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Belarus


E. V. SOSHNIKOVA
Republic Scientific and Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Belarus


A. N. MAZURENKO
Republic Scientific and Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Belarus


O. N. VASKO
Republic Scientific and Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Belarus


R. A. KRIVOROT
Republic Scientific and Practical Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Belarus


References

1. Беляев, В. И. Травма спинного мозга (диагностика, электростимуляционное и восстановительное лечение) / В. И. Беляев. – М., 2001. – 240 с.

2. Смычек, В. Б. Медицинская реабилитация пострадавших от позвоночно-спинальной травмы на этапах оказания специализированной медицинской помощи: инструкция по применению / В. Б. Смычек, Ю. В. Осипов, О. И. Дулуб. – Минск, 2009. – 28 с.

3. Возможности исследования соматосенсорных вызванных потенциалов при патологии позвоночника / А. А. Вишневский [и др.] // Хирургия позвоночника. – 2005. – № 3. – С. 101– 110.

4. Krause, P. Repetitive magnetic and functional electrical stimulation reduce spastic tone increase in patients with spinal cord injury / P. Krause, F. Straube // Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. – 2003. – Vol. 56. – P. 220–225.

5. Role of motor evoked potentials in diagnosis of cauda equine and lumbosacral cord lesions / V. Di Lazzaro [et al.] // Neurology. – 2004. – Vol. 63 (12). – P. 2266–2271.

6. Savic, G. Prognosis and recovery in ischaemic and traumatic spinal cord injury // G. Savic, H. L. Frankel // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. – 1999. – Vol. 67, N 5. – P. 564–565.

7. Denis, F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries / F. Denis // Spine. – 1983. – N 8. – P. 817–831.

8. Практическое руководство по нейротравматологии / Ю. Г. Шанько [и др.]. – Минск: Белпринт, 2010. – 348 с.

9. Плещинский, И. Н. Спинной мозг: афферентные взаимодействия / И. Н. Плещинский, Н. Л. Алексеева // Физиология человека. – 1996. – Т. 22, № 1. – С. 123–130.


Review

For citations:


ILYASEVICH I.A., SOSHNIKOVA E.V., MAZURENKO A.N., VASKO O.N., KRIVOROT R.A. EVALUATION OF THE DESCRIPTIVENESS OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPINAL CORD DISORDERS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2016;(3):20-27. (In Russ.)

Views: 369


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)