Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Choice of the treatment method of low-risk endometrial cancer

Abstract

So far, the issue of radiotherapy (RT) employment in the management of stage I low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients remains controversial. Stage IA, grade 1-2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma is qualified as low-risk. The paper presents the outcomes of surgical (ST) and combination treatment (CT) of low-risk EC patients between 2006 and 2010. There were three most commonly used treatment options in the CT group: 1) preoperative brachytherapy (PBT) plus surgery, its magnitude being hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (HS) (1239 patents); 2) PBT + HS + postoperative external-beam RT (ERT) (1051); 3) HS + ERT (429). A single PBT was performed on the day before surgery at a single target dose of 13.5 Gy, ERT was carried out with conventional fractions of 2 Gy up to a total target dose of 40-44 Gy. Overall 5-year survival with CT was 90.6 %, ST - 87.8 %, cancer-specific survival was 94.6 % and 94.5 %, respectively (р > 0.05). No statistically significant differences between CT and ST (р > 0.05) were found in overall and cancer-specific survivals for stage IAG1 EC without myometrium invasion and for stage IAG2 EC without myometrium invasion. Statistically significant differences in overall survival (р = 0.001) were documented for stage IAG1 EC with myometrium invasion up to 1/2 of its thickness; however, they were not observed in cancer-specific survival (р > 0.05). Overall and cancer-specific survivals for stage IAG2 EC with myometrium invasion up to 1/2 of its thickness appeared to be significantly higher with CT than with ST (р = 0.00004 and р = 0.002). The highest efficacy was attained using CT with PBT and/without postoperative ERT, compared with ST and other CT options. A differentiated approach to RT is needed for low-risk EC. RT is recommended to be completely rejected for stage IAG1-2 EC without myometrium invasion. It is possible to refrain from using RT for stage IAG1 EC with myometrium invasion up to 1/2 of its thickness. There are no reasons to completely reject RT for stage IAG2 EC. Further research is needed to assess the role of RT for stage IAG1-2 EC with myometrium invasion up to 1/2 of its thickness.

About the Authors

S. A. Mavrichev
N. N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Belarus


S. A. Krasny
N. N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Belarus


References

1. Океанов, А. Е. Статистика онкологических заболеваний / А. Е. Океанов, П. И. Моисеев, Л. Ф. Левин; под ред. О. Г. Суконко. - Минск, 2014. - 382 с.

2. Malkasian, G. D. Carcinoma of the endometrium: effect of stage and grade on survival / G. D. Malkasian // Cancer. -1978. - Vol. 41, N 3. - P. 996-1001.

3. Greutzberg, C. Perspectives in gynecologic oncology: 6th Eur. congr. / C. Greutzberg. - Nice, 2009. - P. 49-60.

4. Sobin, L. H. TNM classification of malignant tumours / L. H. Sobin, M. K. Gospodarowich, Ch. Wittekind. - 7th ed. -Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. - P. 212-216.

5. Fanning, J. Treatment for early endometrial cancer. Cost-effectiveness analysis / J. Fanning // J. Repr. Med. - 1999. -Vol. 44, N 8. - P. 719-723.

6. Lymph node dissection in the surgical management of stage I endometrial carcinomas / D. Querleu [et al.] // Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. - 2003. - Vol. 31, N 12. - P. 1004-1012.

7. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study / R. C. Boronow [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. - 1984. - Vol. 63. - P. 825-832.

8. Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients / J. K. Chan [et al.] // Cancer. - 2006. - Vol. 107, N 8. - P. 1823-1830.

9. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study / H. Kitchener [et al.] // Lancet. - 2009. - Vol. 373, N 9658. - P. 125-136.

10. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial / Panici P. Benedetti [et al.] // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 2008. - Vol. 100, N 23. - P. 1660-1661.

11. Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer / K. May [et al.] // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. -2010. - CD 0077585.

12. Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? / A. Mariani [et al.] // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. - 2000. - Vol. 182, N 6. - P. 1506-1519.

13. Postoperative external irradiation and prognostic parameters in stage I endometrial carcinoma: clinical and histopathologic study of 540 patients / J. Aalders [et al.] // Obstet. Gynecol. - 1980. - Vol. 56, N 4. - P. 419-427.

14. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecology Oncology Group study / H. M. Keys [et al.] // Gynecol. Oncol. - 2004. - Vol. 62. - P. 744-751.

15. A phase III randomized study of surgery vs surgery plus adjunctive radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma (GOG 99) / J. A. Roberts [et al.] // Gynecol. Oncol. - 1998. - Vol. 68. - P. 135.

16. For the PORTEC Study Group (post-operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma). Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-I endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomized trial / C. L. Greutsberg [et al.] // Lancet. - 2000. - Vol. 355 (9213). - P. 1404-1411.

17. Adjuvant radiotherapy in women with stage I endometrial cancer: a systematic rev. / H. Lukka [et al.] // Gynecol. Oncol. - 2006. - Vol. 102, N 2. - P. 361-368.

18. Ten-year data on 138 patients with endometrial carcinoma and postoperative vaginal brachytherapy alone: no need for external-beam radiotherapy in low and intermediate risk patients / B. Roper [et al.] // Gynecol. Oncol. - 2007. - Vol. 107, N 3. - P. 541-548.

19. Endometrial cancer: A review and current management strategies: Part II / SGO Clinical Practice Endometrial Cancer Working Group; for the Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Practice Committee / W. M. Burke [et al.] // Gynecol. Oncol. - 2014. - Vol. 134, N 2. - P. 393-402.

20. Uterine neoplasms. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Version 2. - 2015. - P. 85.


Review

For citations:


Mavrichev S.A., Krasny S.A. Choice of the treatment method of low-risk endometrial cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2015;(4):12-22. (In Russ.)

Views: 424


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)