Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Features of engraftment and rejection of ear alatransplants in laboratory rats

https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2021-18-4-422-432

Abstract

 A method for revealing genetic affinity between laboratory rats has been developed, which is based on the transplantation of ear skin-chondrocyte allografts onto the surface of a full-thickness skin defect. On the example of Wistar rats (laboratory rats were taken from three research institutes), it was shown that the rejection of allografts occurs in the interval between 8 and 21 days with the same genetic differences that existed between the animals. However, at the same time, only those structures of ear allografts such as the dermis, epidermis and its derivatives die and are rejected, but the layers of chondrocytes are submerged under the granulation tissue and remain in a viable position for at least 210 days. The latter phenomenon is probably due to the membranes that cover the chondrocytes and act as an immunological barrier.

About the Authors

A. A. Astrowski
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Alexander A. Astrowski – D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the group

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



H. F. Raduta
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Helena F. Raduta – Senior Researcher

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



A. A. Bakunovich
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Alexey A. Bakunovich – Junior Researcher

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



Yu. V. Yarashenka
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Yulia V. Yarаshenkа – Junior Researcher

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



A. V. Shuryberka
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Alexey V. Shuryberka – Head of the Sector

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



V. O. Shatrova
Grodno State Medical University
Belarus

Vera O. Shatrova – Lecturer

80, Gorky Str., 230009, Grodno



V. U. Buko
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Vyacheslav U. Buko – D. Sc. (Med.), Professor

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



I. N. Semenenya
Institute of Biochemistry of Biologically Active Compounds of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Igor N. Semenenya – D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Director.

50, BLK, 230030, Grodno



References

1. Staats J. Standardized nomenclature for inbred strains of mice: third listing. Cancer Research, 1964, vol. 24, pp. 147–168.

2. Beskova T. B. Modification of skin grafting method in laboratory mice. Biomeditsina [Biomedicine], 2007, no. 6, pp. 161–163 (in Russian).

3. Semenov Kh. Kh., Karkishchenko N. N., Beskova T. B., Matveenko E. L. The study of homozygosis in two substrains BALB/cY and BALB/cP of high inbread BALB/c strain. Biomeditsina [Biomedicine], 2009, no. 1, pp. 49–54 (in Russian).

4. Geon A. Kim, Hyun Ju Oh, Min Jung Kim, Young Kwang Jo, Jin Choi, Jung Eun Park [et al.]. Survival of skin graft between transgenic cloned dogs and non-transgenic cloned dogs. PLoS ONE, 2014, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e108330. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108330

5. Martin M. J., Yin D., Adams C., Houtz J., Shen J., Chong A. S., Sharma A., Byrne G. W., Wiseman B. S., Logan J. S. Skin graft survival in genetically identical cloned pigs. Cloning and Stem Cells, 2003, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 117–121. https://doi. org/10.1089/153623003322234713

6. Kwak H. H., Park K.-M., Nam H.-S., Park S.-M., Woo H.-M. Skin graft survival in genetically identical bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells cloned pigs with different mitochondrial haplotypes. Transplantation Journal, 2012, vol. 94, no. 10, p. 574.

7. Bakunovich A. A., Astrowski A. A., Yarashenka Y. V., Buko V. U. New approach to assess the readiness of the wound surface for acceptance of a skin graft. Priority directions of science development. Abstracts of V International scientific and practical conference (Lviv, Ukraine, March 2–3, 2020). Lviv, 2020, pp. 75–79.

8. Sanzone C. F., Reith E. J. The development of the elastic cartilage of the mouse pinna. American Journal of Anatomy, 1976, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001460103

9. Ahmed Y. A., Abdelsabour-Khalaf M. Adipochondrocytes in rabbit auricular cartilage. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, 2018, vol. 64, no. 156, pp. 105–109. https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.2018.168704

10. Kostović-Knežević L., Bradamante Ž., Švajger A. Ultrastructure of elastic cartilage in the rat external ear. Cell Tissue Research, 1981, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00210101

11. Bradamante Ž., Kostović-Knežević L., Levak-Švajger B., Švajger A. Differentiation of the secondary elastic cartilage in the external ear of the rat. International Journal of Development Biology, 1991, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 311–320.

12. State Standart 33215-2014. Guidelines for the maintenance and care of laboratory animals. Rules for equipping premises and organizing procedures. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2019. 12 p. (in Russian).

13. State Standart 33216-2014. Guidelines for the maintenance and care of laboratory animals. Rules for the maintenance and care of laboratory rodents and rabbits. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2019. 9 p. (in Russian).

14. TKP 125-2008 (02040). Good Laboratory Practice. Minsk. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Belarus, 2008. 35 p. (in Russian).

15. Janeway Ch. A., Travers Jr. P., Walport M., Shlomchik M. J. Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease. 5th ed. New York, Garland Publishing, 2001. 884 p.

16. Simpson E. A. Historical perspective on immunological privilege. Immunological Reviews, 2006, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00434.x

17. Forrester J. V., Xu H., Lambe T., Cornall R. Immune privilege or privileged immunity? Mucosal Immunology, 2008, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2008.27

18. Niederkorn J. Y. See no evil, hear no evil, do no evil: the lessons of immune privilege. Source of the Document Nature Immunology, 2006, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1328

19. Kaplan H. J. Anatomy and function of the eye. Immune Response and the Eye. Vol. 92. Basel, 2007, pp. 4–10.

20. Niederkorn J. Y., Stein-Streilein J. History and physiology of immune privilege. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, 2010, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 19–23. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273940903564766

21. Obermeier B., Verma A., Ransohoff R. M. The blood–brain barrier. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam, 2016, vol. 133, pp. 39–59.

22. Banks W. A. The blood–brain barrier in neuroimmunology: tales of separation and assimilation. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2015, vol. 44, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2014.08.007

23. Kaur G., Vadala S., Dufour J. M. An overview of a Sertoli cell transplantation model to study testis morphogenesis and the role of the Sertoli cells in immune privilege. Environmental Epigenetics, 2017, vol. 3, no. 3, art. dvx012. https://doi. org/10.1093/eep/dvx012

24. Batteux, F., Lores P., Bucchini D., Chiocchia G. transgenic expression of fas ligand on thyroid follicular cells prevents autoimmune thyroiditis. Journal of Immunology, 2000, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 1681–1688. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1681

25. Hewitt M., Madden J. C., Rowe P. H., Cronin M. T. D. Structure-based modelling in reproductive toxicology: (Q)SARs for the placental barrier. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2007, vol. 18, no. 1–2, pp. 57–76. https://doi. org/10.1080/10629360601053893

26. Challier J. C. The placental barrier: structure, resistance, asymmetry. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 1989, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 703–716.

27. Bhattacharya N., Sengupta P. Placenta: a massive biological resource for clinical applications in regenerative medicine. Madridge Journal of Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2019, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 84–89. https://doi.org/10.18689/ mjiem-1000119

28. Cheng X., Zhao T., Li G. Allotransplantation of cryopreserved fetal cartilage in plastic surgery. Zhonghua, 1999, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–45.


Review

For citations:


Astrowski A.A., Raduta H.F., Bakunovich A.A., Yarashenka Yu.V., Shuryberka A.V., Shatrova V.O., Buko V.U., Semenenya I.N. Features of engraftment and rejection of ear alatransplants in laboratory rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2021;18(4):422-432. (In Bel.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2021-18-4-422-432

Views: 461


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)