Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Opportunities and risks of colonoscopy in colonic diverticular disease

https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2025-22-3-256-264

Abstract

This article analyzes the results of screening, diagnostic, and differential diagnostic colonoscopy. The efficacy of colonoscopy (sensitivity and specificity) in the diagnosis of colonic diverticular disease was determined in relation to pathological processes occurring in the intestinal lumen, its wall, mesentery, and other organs of the abdominal cavity and pelvis. The sensitivity and specificity of colonoscopy in examining the intestinal lumen were 87 and 83 %, respectively, while in examining the intestinal wall, they were 23.03 and 81 %, respectively. With regard to the efficacy of colonoscopies in detecting pathologies of the mesentery and other abdominal and pelvic organs, the results were null. Henceforth, colonoscopy is an informative diagnostic method for pathological processes in the lumen of the large intestine without radiation exposure. During the procedure, video recording with subsequent analysis can be performed, a biopsy can be taken for differential diagnosis, and the source of bleeding can be identified if present. Having said that colonoscopies have several limitations that reduce their effectiveness in cases of complicated colonic diverticular disease. These limitations include the inability to assess the condition of the paracolic tissue, mesentery, or other abdominal and pelvic organs; difficulty in accurately localizing diverticula and inflammatory processes relative to intestinal segments; inability to evaluate the extent of parietal pathological changes; impossibility of examining proximal intestinal segments in cases of stenosis or obstruction of the lower sections; and most importantly, the risk of intestinal wall perforation. Consequently, colonoscopies in cases of diverticular disease should be performed in strict accordance with established indications, which include obtaining biopsy material and identifying the source of the bleeding.

About the Authors

I. A. Hadji-Ismail
Institute for Advanced Training and Retraining of Healthcare Personnel of the Educational Institution “Belarusian State Medical University”
Belarus

Ismail A. Hadji-Ismail ‒ Ph. D. (Med.), Associate Professor

223041, a/g Lesnoy-1, Minsk Region, Minsk District, Republic of Belarus



I. Mdzevashvili
Institute for Advanced Training and Retraining of Healthcare Personnel of the Educational Institution “Belarusian State Medical University”
Belarus

Ioane Mdzevashvili – Resident

223041, a/g Lesnoy-1, Minsk Region, Minsk District, Republic of Belarus



Ya. K. Mamai
Institute for Advanced Training and Retraining of Healthcare Personnel of the Educational Institution “Belarusian State Medical University”
Belarus

Yahor K. Mamai ‒ Resident

223041, a/g Lesnoy-1, Minsk Region, Minsk District, Republic of Belarus



References

1. Niikura R., Nagata N., Shimbo T., Akiyama J., Uemura N. Colonoscopy can miss diverticula of the left colon identified by barium enema. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 2362–2367. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i15.2362

2. Shcherbakov P. L. On the 50th anniversary of the introduction into clinical practice of flexible endoscopy. Steps and prospects of development of endoscopy of gastrointestinal tract. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya [Experimental and clinical gastroenterology], 2011, no. 10, pp. 3‒8 (in Russian).

3. Kostyakova E. A. Development and possibilities of endoscopic methods and chromoendoscopy in diagnostics of upper gastrointestinal tract pathology. Vestnik Smolenskoi gosudarstvennoi meditsinskoi akademii [Bulletin of the Smolensk State Medical Academy], 2012, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 75‒81 (in Russian).

4. Ushaeva L. A., Balalykin D. A. Prediction of development of relapse of peptic ulcer disease using chromoendoscopy. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya [Experimental and clinical gastroenterology], 2008, no. 6, pp. 17‒21 (in Russian).

5. Wong Kee Song L. M., Adler D. G., Chand B., Conway J. D., Croffie J. M., Disario J. A. [et al.]. Chromoendoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2007, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 639‒649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.029

6. Choi C. S., Choi S. C., Seo G. S., Cho E. Y., Cho H. J., Kim Y. S., Kim K. H., Kim T. H., Nah Y. H. Association between diverticu losis and colonic neoplasm in Koreans. Korean Journal of Gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2007, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 364‒368 (in Korean).

7. Kieff B. J., Eckert G. J., Imperiale T. F. Is diverticulosis associated with colorectal neoplasia? A cross-sectional colonoscopic study.American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 2007‒2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30332.x

8. Stefansson T., Ekbom A., Sparèn P., Påhlman L. Increased risk of left sided colon cancer in patients with diverticular disease. Gut, 1993, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 499‒502. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.34.4.499

9. Morini S., Hassan C., Zullo A., De Francesco V., Feats V., Barberani F., Fallen D., Stroffolini T. Diverticular disease as a risk factor for sigmoid colon adenomas. Digestive and Liver Disease, 2001, vol. 34, suppl. 1, p. A40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1590-8658(01)80314-5

10. Ben Yaacoub I., Boulay-Coletta I., Julles M. C., Zins M. CT findings of misleading features of colonic diverticulitis. Insights Imaging, 2011, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 69‒84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0051-6

11. Rafferty J., Shellito P., Hyman N. H., Buie W. D. Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2006, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 939‒944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0578-2

12. Jacobs D. O. Clinical practice. Diverticulitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007, vol. 357, no. 20, pp. 2057‒2066. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp073228

13. Kinoshita M., Inoue Y., Abe T., Futai R., Miki M., Abe S. [et al.]. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for colonic diverticular bleeding. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2017, vol. 32, suppl. 3, art. P-0398.

14. Kavin H., Sinicrope F., Esker A. H. Management of perforation of the colon at colonoscopy. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1992, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 161‒167.

15. Koperna T., Kisser M., Reiner G., Schulz F. Diagnosis and treatment of bleeding colonic diverticula. Hepatogastroenterology, 2001, vol. 48, no. 39, pp. 702‒705.

16. Brayko C. M., Kozarek R. A., Sanowski R. A., Howells T. Diverticular rupture during colonoscopy. Fact or fancy? Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1984, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 427‒431. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296218


Review

For citations:


Hadji-Ismail I.A., Mdzevashvili I., Mamai Ya.K. Opportunities and risks of colonoscopy in colonic diverticular disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2025;22(3):256-264. https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2025-22-3-256-264

Views: 22


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)