Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series

Advanced search

Pathogenetic and clinical aspects of antibody formation to glutathione peroxidase in systemic lupus erythematosus

https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2025-22-3-232-238

Abstract

This study aims to explore the clinical and pathogenetic role of antibodies (AT) to glutathione peroxidase (GP) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using antigen immobilization technology on polyacrylamide granules with magnetic properties.
The study involved 65 patients with diagnosed SLE, aged 18 to 67, years who were receiving inpatient treatment. The diagnosis was verified according to the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria, and disease activity was assessed using the ECLAM scale. The control group consisted of 30 practically healthy individuals. The presence of antibodies to glutathione peroxidase was determined in the blood serum of patients by means of the indirect ELISA method, using polyacrylamide granules with magnetic properties synthesized by the original technology. The enzyme activity in blood plasma was measured by the Flohe–Günzler method. In the group of patients diagnosed with SLE, a decrease in enzyme activity was observed in comparison to the control group. The level of antibodies to glutathione peroxidase in patients with SLE was found to be statistically significantly higher than the level of the same indicator in donors. There was a tendency for the content of autoantibodies to increase with the activity of the pathological process. AT to GP were more frequently detected in patients with active SLE (ECLAM > 2). Among patients with SLE who demonstrated the presence of serum antibodies, enzyme activity was statistically significantly lower when compared to patients without antibodies. The highest initial antibody levels were also observed in cases involving of heart, nervous system, and joint damage, whereas the lowest levels were observed in cases of kidney damage. The dynamics of antibody concentrations were most pronounced in patients with heart damage, and statistically significant differences were also observed in cases of neurolupus, joint damage, and skin damage. In SLE, there is a clear tendency for plasma GP activity to decrease and the average concentration of circulating antibodies
to GP to increase with increasing disease activity. Treatment of SLE is accompanied by a tendency to normalize enzymatic activity and decrease the concentration of specific antibodies. Determination of plasma GP activity and serum antibodies to GP are promising biomarkers for assessing SLE activity

About the Authors

O. I. Emelyanova
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology named after A. B. Zborovsky
Russian Federation

Olga I. Emelyanova – Ph. D. (Med.), Leading Researcher

76, Zemlyachki Str., 400138, Volgograd, Russian Federation



A. S. Trofimenko
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology named after A. B. Zborovsky
Russian Federation

Andrey S. Trofimenko – Ph. D. (Med.), Head of the Laboratory

76, Zemlyachki Str., 400138, Volgograd, Russian Federation



O. A. Rusanova
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology named after A. B. Zborovsky
Russian Federation

Olga A. Rusanova – Ph. D. (Med.), Junior Researcher

76, Zemlyachki Str., 400138, Volgograd, Russian Federation



References

1. Panafidina T. A., Popkova T. V., Aseeva E. A., Lila A. M. Modern approach to the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Doktor.Ru [Doctor.Ru], 2021, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 40–54 (in Russian).

2. Bazhanov N. N., Pak Yu. V. Damage to the myocardium and coronary arteries of the heart in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Terapevticheskii arkhiv [Therapeutic archive], 2004, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 86–90 (in Russian).

3. Perl A. Oxidative stress in the pathology and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2013, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 674–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.147

4. de Oliveira M. A. A., Mallmann N. H., de Souza G. K. B. B., de Jesus Bacha T., Lima E. S., de Lima D. S. N., de Souza Passos L. F., de Souza Gonçalves M., de Moura Neto J. P. Glutathione S-transferase, catalase, and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase gene polymorphisms modulate redox potential in systemic lupus erythematosus patients from Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Clinical Rheumatology, 2021, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 3639–3649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05680-0

5. Lisitsina T. A., Ivanova M. M., Durnev A. D. Reactive oxygen species and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences], 1996, no. 12, pp. 15–20 (in Russian).

6. Lalaeva A. M., Piryatinskaya A. B., Gribanova T. V., Smirnova O. N., Belova E. A., Nechaeva O. S. Systemic lupus erythematosus (damage to the skin, joints, kidneys, central nervous system). Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya [Clinical dermatology and venereology], 2014, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 23–26 (in Russian).

7. Smallwood M. J., Nissim A., Knight A. R., Whiteman M., Haigh R., Winyard P. G. Oxidative stress in antoimmune rheumatic diseases. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2018, vol. 125, pp. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.05.086

8. Shah D., Mahajan N., Sah S., Nath S. K., Paudyal B. Oxidative stress and its biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of Biomedical Science, 2014, vol. 21, no. 1, art. 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-21-23

9. Aringer M. EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2019, vol. 49, no. 3S, pp. S14–S17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.09.009

10. Bombardieri S., Vitali C., Caponi L., Manca L., Bencivelli W. Activity criteria in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 1994, vol. 12, suppl. 11, pp. S45–S48.

11. Gontar’ I. P., Zborovskii A. B., Levkin S. V., Sycheva G. F. Method for producing magnetic polyacrylamide granules. Patent no. SU 1582657 A1, 1996. 5 p. (in Russian).

12. Flohé L., Günzler W. A. Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 1984, vol. 105, pp. 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05015-1

13. Kulinskii V. I., Kolesnichenko L. S. Structure, properties, biological considerations, and regulation of gluthatione peroxidase. Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii [Advances in modern biology], 1993, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 107–122 (in Russian).

14. Wang H., Tang R., Pan Q., Yin Q., Feng J., Deng L. Mitochondria dysfunction: A trigger for cardiovascular diseases in systemic lupus erythematosus. International Immunopharmacology, 2025, vol. 144, art. 113722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113722

15. Shiomi T., Tsutsui H., Matsusaka H., Murakami K., Hayashidani S., Ikeuchi M., Wen J., Kubota T., Utsumi H., Takeshita A. Overexpression of glutathione peroxidase prevents left ventricular remodeling and failure after myocardial infarction in mice. Circulation, 2004, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000109701.77059.E9

16. Matsushima S., Kinugawa S., Ide T., Matsusaka H., Inoue N., Ohta Y., Yokota T., Sunagawa K., Tsutsui H. Overexpression of glutathione peroxidase attenuates myocardial remodeling and preserves diastolic function in diabetic heart. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2006, vol. 291, no. 5, pp. H2237–H2245. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00427.2006

17. Mao C., Lei G., Zhuang L., Gan B. Ferroptosis as an important driver of lupus. Protein and Cell, 2022, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-021-00892-1


Review

For citations:


Emelyanova O.I., Trofimenko A.S., Rusanova O.A. Pathogenetic and clinical aspects of antibody formation to glutathione peroxidase in systemic lupus erythematosus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Medical series. 2025;22(3):232-238. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1814-6023-2025-22-3-232-238

Views: 17


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1814-6023 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2350 (Online)